This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fix eh tests on x86-darwin
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
- Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com, iant at google dot com
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:28:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: fix eh tests on x86-darwin
- References: <200608252259.k7PMxFrr027798@earth.phy.uc.edu> <44EF85E1.5080908@apple.com>
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 16:21 -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Please reread what he said. He said "for the lifetime of 4.2", and
> unless you can claim better knowledge than Geoff (or I for that matter)
> on the future of these two targets please drop this line of discussion.
> If you have technical concerns over the patch please raise them.
Yes the last time a patch like this was committed that was not tested
that much it and was not really a regression, it caused a bootstrap
failure on a secondary target. I would hope Mark could reply in saying
if this a good patch for 4.2 or not. To me it is not useful at all
since Apple does not take care of any of their targets as evidence by
all the powerpc64-darwin bugs that don't get fixed. I would hope Geoff
would not abuse his global maintainership like he usually does.
-- Pinski