This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] for PR 27735

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:08:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] for PR 27735
References: <20060524095159.GA14182@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200608101624.39380.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <44DB4EF4.1010403@dberlin.org> <200608110005.26485.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

> I beg to differ: the testcase is essentially made up of a single loop exposing 
> a blatant opportunity for unswitching with an irreducibility condition.  
> Anyone implementing a loop unswitching pass would love to have such a 
> testcase at hand.  So I think it deserves the loop-unswitch-?.c name.

FWIW, I like more descriptive names as well, and that's what we've done
in the C++ testsuite, for the most part.

However, I think that this is up to the testsuite maintainers to decide.
 I suggest Janice offer her opinion.  Furthermore, since, surely, having
the test is more important than worrying about it's name, I suggest we
agree just to accept Janice's determination without comment.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] for PR 27735
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [patch] for PR 27735
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch] for PR 27735
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [patch] for PR 27735
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]