This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: iant at google dot com
Cc: ebotcazou at adacore dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz, rguenther at suse dot de, sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:38:40 EDT
Subject: Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
References: <20060520192624.GA28713@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20060628040144.GA6271@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <m3y7vadmqz.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <200607040818.23674.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20060705204845.GB17429@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <m3irmb93bh.fsf@dhcp-172-18-108-216.corp.google.com>

    > It would be nice if somebody could write down the rules for subtypes
    > of INTEGER_TYPE.  As far as I know they are undocumented.  

Can you say what type of information you're looking for?  My view has always
been that they follow the standard rules of all types, with nothing special
going on.  Some languages have rules regarding in which types arithmetic
is done, but those are necessarily language-specific.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Duncan Sands

References:
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]