This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING]^N Fix ppc64 bootstrap with a -m32 host compiler


On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:46:18PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > 
> > /me wonders why there isn't a stage2-specific build-libiberty then.
> 
> It sounds to me like during stage 2 of a bootstrap, we should be using
> host libiberty rather than build libiberty.  There's already one of
> those, I think.  Or I may be off by one stage.

But this is exactly what happens and is bogus?  We should be using the
libiberty build by the stage1 compiler to link the stage2 binaries,
the libiberty build with the host compiler is a 32bit object, while
the stage1 compiler builds 64bit objects.

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Novell / SUSE Labs


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]