This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/27821

From: "Lee Millward" <lee dot millward at gmail dot com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:53:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/27821
References: <9784d3ab0606181424i9efc8bdhd3afbf1235b7ca42@mail.gmail.com> <449997CC.6050700@codesourcery.com>

On 6/21/06, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

Lee Millward wrote:

> 2006-06-18  Lee Millward  <lee.millward@gmail.com>
>
>     PR c++/27821
>     * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Return error_mark_node
>     on invalid uses of the scope resolution operator.
>
> testsuite/
>
> 2006-06-18  Lee Millward  <lee.millward@gmail.com>
>
>     PR c++/27821
>     * g++.dg/template/error22.C: New test.

OK, thanks.


Is this also ok for the 4.1/4.0 branches after a successful
bootstrap/regression test there since this is a regression from 3.4.0?
I believe the policy is to allow the patch to be on mainline for a few
days/one week before applying on a release branch to be sure there is
no fallout?

Cheers,
Lee

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/27821
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [patch] Fix PR c++/27821
  - From: Lee Millward
- Re: [patch] Fix PR c++/27821
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]