This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?)

> > I know, for example, SuSE has such a build farm that is accessible by
> > email (IE you email patches to it).
> > 
> > If they were willing to let the patchapp submit emails (or xmlrpc or
> > whatever), and there was a way for it to notify the patchapp about the
> > results (xmlrpc or http post would be fine), that would be ideal.

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:55:30PM +0200, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> there are several problems with the idea.  With the current setup, we
> cannot make the testers available to public for security reasons.
> Testing each patch takes several hours, so for larger-scale usage we
> would need to dedicate more machines to the task than we do now.  Also,
> the testers need some maintenance -- 1-2 hours each month for me, but
> this would obviously go up with the more intensive usage.  I do not
> think it would be possible for SuSE by itself to accomodate for these
> demands.

This is understandable.  In any case, it would probably best to have
a human in the loop before submitting patches to autobuilders, both
for security reasons and as a sanity check, to avoid wasting resources
on an unacceptable patch.  Machine donors (maybe SuSE?) would authorize
a small number of people to submit patches to the auto-builder after
an initial review.

I'm now starting to get a clue as to why Mike talked about a review before
the auto-builder instead of after.  Maybe the pre-review would just be
a very cursory sanity check, with the real review to happen after it

> Perhaps in the cooperation with other companies interested in gcc, we
> could put together enough hardware and developer time to realize this
> idea (don't take it as promise of anything from the SuSE side, though --
> I have very little say regarding that).  I think it might be good to
> discuss it at gcc summit.

If people like the concept, but there's a shortage of dedicated equipment,
perhaps donations can be solicited.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]