This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: darwin cross compiling breakage
On 6/10/06, Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com> wrote:
On 09/06/2006, at 5:25 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Saturday 10 June 2006 02:03, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
>> Mike Stump <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> On Jun 6, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
>>>> The recent changes to support code generation for the current
>>>> machine on x86 has broken darwin's ppc x i386 compiler.
>> This is OK, except lose the APPLE LOCAL markers.
> How can this be OK when people raise issues with the patch?
"OK" does not mean that we have perfect consensus and everyone
agrees. It means that on balance it is better to have this patch
Based on this reasoning, maybe you can approve the following patch as well.
2006-05-25 Richard Guenther <email@example.com>
* Makefile.in: Use correct libiberty if bootstrapping
in a semi-cross environment.
(even if people here as well think ppc32 -> ppc64 is a cross compiler).