This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [MinGW] PR target/19970: Java unnecessarily disabled for MinGW in top-level configure


>>>>> "Nathanael" == Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm> writes:

>> Yet I fail to understand the need for --enable/disable-libgcj if it is
>> merely being used to enable/disable java.  Why isn't that being done via
>> language variable?

Nathanael> Probably historical.  :-)

Yeah.  I no longer remember the reason for this.

Nathanael> Perhaps you could work up a patch for the top level which
Nathanael> does the following:
[...]

Nathanael> This would simplify the gunk at the toplevel quite a bit.
Nathanael> Can anyone think of a reason not to do this?

It sounds good to me.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]