This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Vladimir N. Makarov wrote:I don't think that this patch will update bb end e.g. when the last insn in the bb is NOTE_FUNCTION_END which gives you null bb.
Richard Guenther wrote:
...
Maxim, please don't disable bootstrap when submitting a patch to the main line. You should check other major platforms too (like x86, x86_64, and ppc if you have them).I wonder why you tested this on i686 when the PR is for target ia64. Can you also add the reduced testcase to gcc.c-torture/compile?
I can guess that you put gcc_asserts as in move_insn but unlink_other_notes is called not for all basic block (some notes has no bb field).
I am afraid you broke not only i64 but other targets too. So please fix this as soon as possible. I'll wait for the patch.
Vlad
I am sorry for my mistake. This patch is currently being tested on i386-pc-linux-gnu and ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |