Re: Patch: Configure boehm_gc the same for cross-build as native...

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

Boehm, Hans wrote:
> A slight variant of this is in the upstream source.  I'd be happy to
> conform to gcc policy on this point, but I'm not sure I can officially
> approve it for gcc.
>
>   
Not a problem.  I was expecting to wait for one of the official libgcj 
maintainers to render an opinion.

Would it make sense to use the exact patch you have in the upstream 
source?  Or should we commit this, and on the next import use what you have?

David Daney.



> Hans
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Daney [mailto:ddaney@avtrex.com] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:14 PM
> > To: Java Patch List
> > Cc: gcc-patches; Boehm, Hans
> > Subject: Patch: Configure boehm_gc the same for cross-build 
> > as native...
> >
> > Under the principle that Mark Mitchell outlined in this message:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00229.html
> >
> > That "cross-compilation of GCC behaves the same as native 
> > compilation.", I submit the following patch to the boehm_gc.
> >
> > Currently when cross compiling, some of the debugging 
> > capabilities of the GC are disabled.  This patch removes 
> > these differences.
> >
> > Currently building/testing on mipsel-linux cross compiler, 
> > and i686-pc-linux-gnu native build.
> >
> > OK to commit if no regressions?
> >
> > David Daney
> >
> > boehm_gc:
> > 2006-06-06  David Daney  <ddaney@avtrex.com>
> >
> > 	* configure.ac: Remove NO_SIGSET and NO_DEBUGGING AC_DEFINEs
> > 	when cross compiling.
> > 	* include/gc_config.h.in: Regenerate.
> > 	* configure:  Regenerate.
> >
> >