This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Fix bit-rotted --enable-maintainer-mode (bootstrap/20437)


>>>>> "Laurynas" == Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com> writes:

Laurynas> This patch fixes autotools invocation for fixincludes if srcdir !=
Laurynas> objdir and adds missing gcc/Makefile.in dependency. I'm asking for
Laurynas> approval, but I wonder if such patches are considered obvious?

I usually interpret "obvious" as really obvious things like typos,
but opinions vary here.

This patch looks reasonable to me.  I can't approve it though.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]