This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change

From: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1 at de dot ibm dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:15:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
References: <20060530080425.GA3122@de.ibm.com> <447C2CD4.2000002@t-online.de> <20060530121614.GA3843@de.ibm.com> <447C4339.5000107@t-online.de> <20060530165253.GA4590@de.ibm.com> <447D9229.3050201@t-online.de>

> >Ok for gcc 4.1 branch as well?
> 
> Is it a regression?
I could reproduce the failure only with the -march=z9-109 option which is
new in gcc 4.1.0. So it is a regression against 4.0 right?!

Bye,

-Andreas-

References:
- [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Andreas Krebbel
- Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Andreas Krebbel
- Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Andreas Krebbel
- Re: [PATCH] cse (canon_reg): Don't modify insns without using validate_change
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]