This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] java stacktrace fix

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:17:07 +0930
Subject: Re: [PATCH] java stacktrace fix
References: <20060530143537.GC27315@bubble.grove.modra.org> <447CA543.8030807@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:04:19PM -0400, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> Alan Modra wrote:
> >	* stacktrace.cc (_Jv_StackTrace::UpdateNCodeMap): Don't add
> >	interpreted classes.
> >
> >Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux.  OK mainline?
> 
> We can drop the #ifdef INTERPRETER here as _Jv_IsInterpretedClass() is 
> now always defined. Otherwise, OK.

Applied with that change.  I see we have the same bug on 4.1 but lack
the testcase that exposed the problem.  OK for 4.1 too after a
bootstrap there?

If so, I'll also apply the patch you OK'd in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q2/msg00161.html which is
relevant for powerpc64.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] java stacktrace fix
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- [PATCH] java stacktrace fix
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PATCH] java stacktrace fix
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]