On 29 May, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Volker Reichelt wrote:
On 29 May, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This looks ok except for the formatting of the ?: operator.
Should I write it like this?
+ pop_maybe_used (type != error_mark_node
+ ? C_TYPE_VARIABLE_SIZE (type) : false);
Better. Basically, align with the character after the opening paren.
Well, that's what I did. It only looks unaligned in the diff output
because the lower line contains tabs while the upper line doesn't.
The question mark is right under the "t" of "type".