This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch,libgfortran][4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:01:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch,libgfortran][4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io
References: <447B6644.4090708@verizon.net> <20060529214000.GA29556@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:23:16PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:

Hi all,

The following fixes this bug. I would like to commit this right away to 4.1 and 4.2, under the simple rule. I will convert the test case in the PR appropriately to call abort instead of print out a message.

OK?

2006-05-29 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

Yes, it's ok with a regression test on 4.1 and trunk.

Forgot to mention it. NIST Tested and regression tested. Will commit later today.

Thanks Steve.

Jerry

References:
- [patch,libgfortran][4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch,libgfortran][4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]