This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix fortran/PR23151 - illegal print syntax

From: tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
To: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:25:04 +0200
Subject: Re: Fix fortran/PR23151 - illegal print syntax
References: <20060525185330.GA11364@meiner.onlinehome.de>

Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de> wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006:

this fixes PR 23131, where we were accepting an illegal print
syntax.  Regression-testing actually found one such instance
in the testsuite :-)  There are two test cases, one for fixed
and the other one for free format.

To make sense of the patch by looking at it, you'll have to go
back to the "if" that the "else" in the patch refers to, which is

if (gfc_match_char ('(') == MATCH_NO)

OK for trunk? Do we want this for 4.1?


Is something like
  PRINT (i), something
never valid, even with ASSIGNed formats?

- Tobi

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix fortran/PR23151 - illegal print syntax
  - From: Richard E Maine

References:
- Fix fortran/PR23151 - illegal print syntax
  - From: Thomas Koenig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]