This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: rtl_loop_init vs try_redirect_by_replacing_jump vs simple jumps
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 May 2006 22:39:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: rtl_loop_init vs try_redirect_by_replacing_jump vs simple jumps
- References: <200605230351.k4N3pKUY026394@greed.delorie.com> <571f6b510605222326k8b77078gcb38a5fd0787e9cd@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510605222340t59c8cea3h2034cbd4ec2ba090@mail.gmail.com> <200605232138.k4NLcXcP032036@greed.delorie.com>
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
> How about this?
>
> * cfgrtl.c (print_rtl_with_bb): Print predecessor and
> successor edge information as well.
This is OK when we go back to stage 1.
(I've had a similar patch in my own sources for a long time.)
Ian