This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcjh handling of most negative int/longs

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 23 May 2006 09:12:11 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gcjh handling of most negative int/longs
References: <20060523113044.GM30682@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <17523.69.514495.907722@dell.pink> <20060523123532.GN30682@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Jakub" == Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

Jakub> Only in libjava/gcj/javaprims.h, i.e. it has the right type in libjava.
Jakub> But not in gcc/java, where it is typedefed to long.

Instead we should fix javaop.h so that jint is always 32 bits and
jlong always 64 bits.  It seems likely that other code in the front
end relies on this.

Tom

References:
- [PATCH] Fix gcjh handling of most negative int/longs
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcjh handling of most negative int/longs
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcjh handling of most negative int/longs
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]