This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Make adjust_range_with_scev produce only simple bounds
> >some parts of tree-vrp (for example, compare_values function) assume
> >that the bounds of ranges are simple expressions -- constants or ssa
> >names, possibly offsetted by a constant. However,
> >adjust_range_with_scev uses values coming from
> >as these bounds, which causes problems, since analyze_scalar_evolution
> >may return an arbitrary expression. I do not have a testcase for
> >mainline, but this causes a bootstrap failure with a patch I am
> >currently working on. This patch makes us ensure that the value
> >we are going to use as a bound is simple.
> Shouldn't instead we deal with more complex ranges?
as usual, most of the benefits of the optimization come from dealing
with the simple cases, so I guess it would not be really useful;
however, one cannot be sure unless he spends few days playing with
updating vrp to handle them.
> What is an example of range which you are running into which should
> help someone decide if that is really a complex range or not?
In my case, it was something like 42 - ssa_name; however,
analyze_scalar_evolution may return basically arbitrary expression.