This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix df-core to not look for df info on notes


This is OK for mainline also.

Thanks.

Ian

Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> writes:

> this looks fine for the dataflow branch.
> 
> kenny
> 
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the bit of the fwprop patch which had to be posted separately.
> > It changes df-core.c to not look for DF_INSN_UID_GET on notes.  Dan
> > already said this should work.  Kenny, iiuc this should be applied
> > on the dataflow branch as well.
> >
> > Bootstrapped all except Ada on x86_64-suse-linux-gnu with and without
> > the fwprop patch.  Without fwprop there are no new regressions.
> >
> > OK for mainline?  And for the dataflow branch?
> >
> > (With the fwprop patch I get two extra failures which are caused by
> > bugs in fwprop that were hidden with the previous df-core.c diff, see
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-05/msg00727.html.  It seems
> > that fwprop introduces a new JUMP_INSN that sets nothing but (pc), and
> > somehow that insn isn't getting DF info attached to it.  Working on it,
> > but it's irrelevant for this df-core.c patch...)
> >
> > Gr.
> > Steven
> >
> > 	* df-core.c (df_bb_regno_last_use_find): Do not look for dataflow
> > 	information attached to non-INSNs such as NOTEs.
> > 	(df_bb_regno_first_def_find, df_bb_regno_last_def_find): Likewise.
> >
> > Index: df-core.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- df-core.c	(revision 113736)
> > +++ df-core.c	(working copy)
> > @@ -915,10 +915,14 @@ df_bb_regno_last_use_find (struct df *df
> >  {
> >    rtx insn;
> >    struct df_ref *use;
> > +  unsigned int uid;
> >  
> >    FOR_BB_INSNS_REVERSE (bb, insn)
> >      {
> > -      unsigned int uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> > +      if (!INSN_P (insn))
> > +	continue;
> > +
> > +      uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> >        for (use = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->uses; use; use = use->next_ref)
> >  	if (DF_REF_REGNO (use) == regno)
> >  	  return use;
> > @@ -934,10 +938,14 @@ df_bb_regno_first_def_find (struct df *d
> >  {
> >    rtx insn;
> >    struct df_ref *def;
> > +  unsigned int uid;
> >  
> >    FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
> >      {
> > -      unsigned int uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> > +      if (!INSN_P (insn))
> > +	continue;
> > +
> > +      uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> >        for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
> >  	if (DF_REF_REGNO (def) == regno)
> >  	  return def;
> > @@ -953,11 +961,14 @@ df_bb_regno_last_def_find (struct df *df
> >  {
> >    rtx insn;
> >    struct df_ref *def;
> > +  unsigned int uid;
> >  
> >    FOR_BB_INSNS_REVERSE (bb, insn)
> >      {
> > -      unsigned int uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> > +      if (!INSN_P (insn))
> > +	continue;
> >  
> > +      uid = INSN_UID (insn);
> >        for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
> >  	if (DF_REF_REGNO (def) == regno)
> >  	  return def;
> >   


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]