This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/testsuite] detect ICE in testsuite, include in FAIL message


Janis Johnson wrote:

> In some cases there is a single FAIL message for an ICE; in others
> there are additional FAIL messages because I don't remove the ICE
> message from the compiler output, leading to "excess errors" failures.
> That doesn't seem like a big deal since presumably new ICEs will be
> fixed quickly.  Similarly I assume it's not a problem that we can't
> XFAIL an ICE.

I agree that these limitations are OK, given that the goal is zero fails
in the testsuite anyhow.  The only reasons for XFAILs are either
regressions we mean to fix or failures we can live with; an ICE should
always be in the first category.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]