This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Require GMP 4.2 and MPFR 2.2

From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, "Jack Howarth" <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:52:33 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Require GMP 4.2 and MPFR 2.2
References: <20060429181014.B467811003D@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <20060429193738.GA60387@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0605131548420.19658@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <84fc9c000605130731l1c1ef8ffkf1739a8a02caa5e4@mail.gmail.com>

Now, I believe the proposed patch would lock out SUSE 10.1 from
compiling fortran this way, because the mpfr.h header that ships with
its gmp 4.1.4 does not have any VERSION defines included.


I'm not sure I understand. The SUSE 10.1 /usr/include/gmp.h doesn't
have the __GNU_MP_VERSION and such defined? I've got them on a Suse
enterprise server 9. Is that a GMP bug in version 4.1.4 or a distro
problem (in which case it could be fixed, couldn't it?)?

Thanks,
FX

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Require GMP 4.2 and MPFR 2.2
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: [PATCH] Require GMP 4.2 and MPFR 2.2
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]