RE: [RFA][Patch] Update on gcc installation specific web page

["Anil Paranjape" <AnilP1 at KPITCummins dot com>]

Hi DJ,

Thank you for your comments.

Sorry I missed out the changelog.
Please find attached updated patch and Changelog,

ChangeLog

2006-05-10  Anil Paranjpe  <anilp1@KPITCummins.com>

 	* doc/install.texi: Added new targets as h8300-*-elf, sh-*-elf. 
	                    Subtargets of sh-*-elf are mentioned.
				  Modified m32c-*-elf target description
by adding R8C, M16C processor families.

Kindly let me know your comments. 

Regards,
Anil


Anil Paranjpe 
Systems Manager, Advanced Technology Solutions-Semiconductor Solutions
Group |KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. | +91 20 25382358 (Board) | +91 20
25381141(Fax) | +91 98226 00602(Cell) | www.kpitcummins.com

**********************************
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. It is intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy,
disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete all copies of this message. KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. does
not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
**********************************
-----Original Message-----
From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj@redhat.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:57 AM
To: Anil Paranjape
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFA][Patch] Update on gcc installation specific web page


Your patch doesn't include a ChangeLog entry.

Your patch also modifies the m32c-elf entry, which you didn't mention in
your email.

You use the term "variant" to refer to processors in the H8 and SH
entries, but the term "target" in the m32c entry.  Other entries on that
page use the term "processor" for these purposes.

For the m32c entry, I suggest using the phrase "Renesas R8C, M16C, and
M32C families of processors." rather than listing every existing
processor.

The SH port supports far more than just ELF, and also supports the sh5
(sh64) families.  By listing SH with only ELF, you are misleading the
reader into thinking that other formats are unsupported.

Attachment: install.texi.patch
Description: install.texi.patch