This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi DJ, Thank you for your comments. Sorry I missed out the changelog. Please find attached updated patch and Changelog, ChangeLog 2006-05-10 Anil Paranjpe <anilp1@KPITCummins.com> * doc/install.texi: Added new targets as h8300-*-elf, sh-*-elf. Subtargets of sh-*-elf are mentioned. Modified m32c-*-elf target description by adding R8C, M16C processor families. Kindly let me know your comments. Regards, Anil Anil Paranjpe Systems Manager, Advanced Technology Solutions-Semiconductor Solutions Group |KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. | +91 20 25382358 (Board) | +91 20 25381141(Fax) | +91 98226 00602(Cell) | www.kpitcummins.com ********************************** This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. ********************************** -----Original Message----- From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:57 AM To: Anil Paranjape Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA][Patch] Update on gcc installation specific web page Your patch doesn't include a ChangeLog entry. Your patch also modifies the m32c-elf entry, which you didn't mention in your email. You use the term "variant" to refer to processors in the H8 and SH entries, but the term "target" in the m32c entry. Other entries on that page use the term "processor" for these purposes. For the m32c entry, I suggest using the phrase "Renesas R8C, M16C, and M32C families of processors." rather than listing every existing processor. The SH port supports far more than just ELF, and also supports the sh5 (sh64) families. By listing SH with only ELF, you are misleading the reader into thinking that other formats are unsupported.
Attachment:
install.texi.patch
Description: install.texi.patch
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |