This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: pex: abstract out temp file name generation
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
> Is there any reason why we don't use one of our already-existing temp
> file generators?
Because we need to respect the PEX_SUFFIX flag, properly combined with
the tempbase and the outname and everything else? The code does use
existing temp name generation functions (make_temp_file); the function
I've pulled out just implements the funky pex-specific rules.