This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:03:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
References: <44319954.7010203@gmail.com> <20060403223025.GA17470@nevyn.them.org> <4431B08E.8060704@stanford.edu> <20060404035253.GA23305@nevyn.them.org>

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:52:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:32:30PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
> > I think this would combine well in combination with my other suggestion, 
> > too -- the explanation there would instead be "-fexternal_blas redirects 
> > use of some matrix intrinsics to external BLAS calls" or something like 
> > that.
> 
> You could arrange to use weak symbols on most targets to get the
> benefits you need here without having to mess with the naming.
> 

Do weak symbols work with static linking?  I thought weak
symbols applied to only shared libraries.

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
  - From: Brooks Moses
- Re: [fortran,patch] BLAS-enabled matmul
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]