This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] 4.1 ivopts bug
- From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 01:41:01 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] 4.1 ivopts bug
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0603310644460.7096-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <442D5955.2030304@codesourcery.com>
On Friday 31 March 2006 17:31, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Roger Sayle wrote:
> > I suspect Mark's decision would be easier if you also bootstrapped
> > and regression tested your patch on one or two primary platforms.
>
> That was in fact going to be my request. If I get to pick, IA32/x86_64
> should be one, and something RISCy for the other; SPARC, PowerPC,
> Itanium, MIPS, etc. If a bootstrap is inconvenient, a cross-compiler
> and regression-testing in simulation would work for me.
>
> I'm inclined to take the patch, given that wrong-code bugs are bad, and
> wrong-code bugs in SPEC are worse, given how many people evaluate by
> running SPEC, but I do want to be cautious, given the size of the patch.
I've bootstrapped and regression tested on i686-linux, x86_64-linux and
powerpc-linux.
Ok to apply?
Paul