This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: Remove fastjar

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:40:34 -0500
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove fastjar
References: <200603302306.k2UN6Dw1006594@earth.phy.uc.edu> <m3mzf6jxep.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

> Andrew> Is there a reason why you are removing support from building
> Andrew> fastjar inside the tree?
> 
> Maybe one of the build maintainers or SC could speak up and provide
> direction here.

My personal opinion is, if leaving it in doesn't bother anything,
leave it in.  Especially if there's even a slight chance that someone
would benefit from such support.

Removing it would make sense if there were a reason to remove it, like
a hairy configure test or complex makefile rules.  It's it's just Yet
Another Module, I see no reason to remove support for it.

References:
- Re: Patch: Remove fastjar
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Patch: Remove fastjar
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]