This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 18:29 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > Perhaps gcc/doc/install.texi should have something added to reflect the > > new requirements for building. > > I still say there is a misunderstanding going on because not all > people will already have a jar program installed (in fact I don't > one installed on my work GNU/Linux box). Making a new requirment > to compile libgcj will make GCC people think twice about compiling > GCC. It is going to be a bit of extra pain for users to compile libgcj if this is removed from the tree. Would it be possible to use the minizip implementation from the included zlib to create the jar/zip file? That way we don't introduce an extra dependency on the user. Or try to detect a working zip binary on the users system? At least a zip utility is more likely to be available then a jar utility. Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |