This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PowerPC] linuxspe vs. ibm long double.

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:50:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [PowerPC] linuxspe vs. ibm long double.
References: <20060330044157.GH22754@bubble.grove.modra.org> <200603302145.k2ULjt712268@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20060330234223.GM22754@bubble.grove.modra.org>

>>>>> Alan Modra writes:

Alan> Well I don't have a strong opinion either way.  Is the patch OK to
Alan> install without the IEEE long double default?

	Yes, okay without the default.

David

References:
- [PowerPC] linuxspe vs. ibm long double.
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PowerPC] linuxspe vs. ibm long double.
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PowerPC] linuxspe vs. ibm long double.
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]