This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:36:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller
References: <bug-21829-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <20060211005940.30518.qmail@sourceware.org> <1142917666.23430.71.camel@to-dhcp19.toronto.redhat.com> <84fc9c000603220314j17ad999kd8e3fd3d58e96e88@mail.gmail.com> <1143036080.14469.46.camel@to-dhcp19.toronto.redhat.com> <84fc9c000603220706i5902e79ct17733d7ce8ead9a0@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:06 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> ;
> 
> see tv_id - so I guess increased CCP times are expected.
Nuts.  I should have made a separate tv_id.  I'll fix that
shortly.  

I probably won't be able to look at the compile-time regression
for your testcase until Friday.

jeff

References:
- Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]