This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 02:08:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
References: <200603190010.40372.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <0e6b23b067b0b17a3c920b35f595c94d@physics.uc.edu> <1caa01df4eace0f74003b896b4024637@physics.uc.edu> <200603190800.18397.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Mar 19, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:

Also do you have a testcase where we would go "wrong" currently?
Compile at -O2 -fno-inline.

Actually this testcase is really the same as PR 24169 :).

Yes that one does not use nested functions but it is the same problem
to the middle-end.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Enhanced nested functions lowering pass
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]