This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] libstdc++/24469
Richard Guenther wrote:
yes, I did study the PR in question (24469), but even from reading
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-07/msg00095.html I cannot reproduce the
failure in question by examining the source (I cannot find users of _M_thread_id
in either mt_allocator.cc or mt_allocator.h apart from two setters on
the v7 branch).
Please look closer ;) (Considering mainline, for the moment) just grep
for the various places where ._M_used[*] is changed. The point is simply
that in one specific place, in _M_reclaim_block, the index is
__block->_M_thread_id, which in general is != __thread_id, thus we are
fiddling with another thread, not the one which is returning memory to
the pool.
Paolo.