Re: [Patch] Add option to reduce amount of reflection data to gcj...

[David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>]

David Daney wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > I don't think the -freflection-data=none option should be there in its
> > current form, since it breaks so much.  Perhaps this option could be
> > enhanced so that we don't silently generate incorrect code.  We should
> > report an error instead.
>
>
> OK, I changed it so it breaks slightly fewer things.

After thinking about it more, I am starting to agree with you.

Let me change it again so that we have only one option 
"-freduced-reflection" that has the semantics of 
-freflection-data=reduced.  This will simplify the patch a little and 
remove the possibility of generating code that is severely broken.

David Daney