This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [m68k] some testsuite cleanups

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:56:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [m68k] some testsuite cleanups
References: <43FB2CD8.7090202@codesourcery.com> <43FB44FB.3040607@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:

Similarly thunk2 has an out-of-range relocation.

That test is already guarded with "{target fpic}"; is it the case that
PIC doesn't really work on this target, or is it just that PIC works,
but this test fails?  It doesn't look like there's anything about that
test that should be so difficult to support.  It might still make sense
to XFAIL it, if it fails in practice, but is there a bug that needs fixing?

It's possible the target should reject the -fpic flag. currently it is accepted, but I'm not sure it makes much sense on a bare elf target.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

References:
- [m68k] some testsuite cleanups
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [m68k] some testsuite cleanups
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]