This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix darwin/25908, key functions vs non weak vtables
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:36:17 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix darwin/25908, key functions vs non weak vtables
- References: <200601261532.k0QFWGBC015147@earth.phy.uc.edu> <20F66F6F-07FC-4937-951A-DD5612F92597@apple.com> <EE2DCF39-3DB1-4AB1-913B-6807FA860283@apple.com>
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Is this ABI-preserving? If not, then it's not OK.
No it is not ABI-preserving and the "correct" patch is then
to revert your patch which I did not want to propose at
least not yet.
-- Pinski