This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:20:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602161347130.27386-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <43F60817.9010209@wanadoo.fr> <20060217173518.GB71493@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <43F6334B.8070201@wanadoo.fr> <1140208683.43f6342bef7c5@www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de>

Tobi,

ever since I have been involved with gfortran, fortran-torture has been more or less deprecated. The entry testcases went in there and now the where_xx series. What's the policy, folks and what are the issues?

You know very well what I meant!

When do we decide to put offerings in fortran-torture?

Why is it more or less deprecated?

Should we make more use of fortran-torture?

Paul

References:
- [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Fortran] Another round of WHERE statement optimizations
  - From: Tobias . Schlueter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]