This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Thanks - I went through every single line of the patch itself, checked the logic, regtested it and checked out the testcases. The one thing I did not do is check out where they were destined to go! However, that brings me to a point; ever since I have been involved with gfortran, fortran-torture has been more or less deprecated. The entry testcases went in there and now the where_xx series. What's the policy, folks and what are the issues?Roger is adding the test under gfortran.fortran-torture. You don't need a { dg-do run } within this directory. When you say the patch is ok, is this for both the frontend patch and the testsuite additions.
The XFAIL that I think is required argues that this one goes in gfortran.dg, no?Brooks' tests are a useful addition; especially since the last one fails (and is wrong, I think).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |