Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:47:29PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:41:26AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > (gdb) r
> > /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.6.f90
> > -quiet -dumpbase a.11.6.f90 -mtune=generic -auxbase-strip a.11.6.s -O
> > -version -fopenmp -o a.11.6.s -I finclude
> > Starting program: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/f951
> > /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.6.f90
> > -quiet -dumpbase a.11.6.f90 -mtune=generic -auxbase-strip a.11.6.s -O
> > -version -fopenmp -o a.11.6.s -I finclude
> > GNU F95 version 4.2.0 20060215 (experimental) [trunk revision 111111
> > clean] (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> >         compiled by GNU C version 4.2.0 20060215 (experimental) [trunk
> > revision 111111 clean].
> > GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param
> > ggc-min-heapsize=131072
> > 
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x00000000004388b1 in resolve_omp_clauses (code=0xb797f0)
> >     at /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/openmp.c:825
> > 825                     switch (list)
> 
> On line 825 I think there is nothing that can segfault, list is an
> automatic int variable.  I certainly can't reproduce what you are seeing,
> on at least {i386,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,ia64}-linux, so I'd appreciate
> if you could find out what exactly segfaulted.
> 

Do you have this

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01249.html

in your tree? My results are for revision 111111, which doesn't have
your change.


H.J.