This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [4.1] fix target/26090
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:55:58 -0500
- Subject: Re: [4.1] fix target/26090
- References: <20060203234924.GA8080@redhat.com> <62ec2bd7d38b03486373ccc8bc166872@physics.uc.edu>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> >Applied for gcc 4.1.
> >
> >For mainline, there are ways to have .rodata for static symbols,
> >which is slightly better. I'd also like to unify some of the code
> >between aix and hpux, this here in ia64, and a similar problem
> >on alpha.
>
> Question, why is this being applied to the 4.1 branch?
> I thought Mark said only regressions should be applied now?
Because it is a regression? Certainly in the 3.2.x era there weren't
(almost) any DT_TEXTREL binaries on IA-64, but in 3.4.x+ there are hundreds
of them.
Jakub