This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [4.1] fix target/26090


On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> >Applied for gcc 4.1.
> >
> >For mainline, there are ways to have .rodata for static symbols,
> >which is slightly better.  I'd also like to unify some of the code
> >between aix and hpux, this here in ia64, and a similar problem
> >on alpha.
> 
> Question, why is this being applied to the 4.1 branch?
> I thought Mark said only regressions should be applied now?

Because it is a regression?  Certainly in the 3.2.x era there weren't
(almost) any DT_TEXTREL binaries on IA-64, but in 3.4.x+ there are hundreds
of them.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]