This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Shantonu Sen <ssen at opendarwin dot org>, Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 01 Feb 2006 03:02:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.
- References: <E55A3F76-4A4B-41F1-8EE7-BFB2B0EA61C8@dalecki.de> <58901028b440a4b228424b1f22b335d1@physics.uc.edu> <6215C6C8-9394-483C-9179-3A699CC806E2@opendarwin.org> <m3lkww2cka.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <b6eb95eb57803f794d4563a611dc77dc@physics.uc.edu> <m3acdcgcqk.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <5fa7f1a61e9560eb614171df4c2b97d0@physics.uc.edu>
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
[...]
| Here is the obvious fix which I was able to get into stage3.
| I committed it after getting into stage3 so I know that it works
| and brings this code back to the same semantics as it was before.
Thanks!
-- Gaby