This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFR: prediction values

From: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
To: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:04:51 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: RFR: prediction values
References: <3A06D7AF-DB6A-42DA-8DB7-DD24BC893204@dalecki.de> <7125eb01387a12f874461f4f44fcfd2f@physics.uc.edu> <F4410941-27F9-4EF5-B118-516B7BB088C4@dalecki.de> <ydd3bj4fjy6.fsf@manam.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <B616E3AA-FD1E-420A-A616-64F079495DD5@dalecki.de>

Marcin Dalecki writes:

> > Please check the GNU Coding Standards for details.
> 
> Yes OK. But what about the actual merit of the patch itself?

It's not my call, but replacing magic numbers by symbolic constants always
seems a useful exercise to improve code readability.

	Rainer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University

References:
- RFR: prediction values
  - From: Marcin Dalecki
- Re: RFR: prediction values
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: RFR: prediction values
  - From: Marcin Dalecki
- Re: RFR: prediction values
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: RFR: prediction values
  - From: Marcin Dalecki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]