Re: RFR fixincludes header consistency

[Bruce Korb <bkorb at gnu dot org>]

Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> On 2006-01-31, at 18:27, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > | Hi,
> > |
> > | I'll almost certainly approve the fixincludes part, but I'd still  like
> > | a gander at the change.  Where can I find it?....
> > | Thanks! - Bruce
> >
> > These are
> >
> >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg02169.html
> >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg02171.html
>
> Sure I will. However I would actually prefer if some of the official  build
> maintainers (you in this case?) would do the actual autoconf/autoheader
> regeneration shim. Just for consistency and because I'm simply not that
> self-confident in this area. OK?

OK.  They look innocuous to me.  In fact, I have trouble seeing how they
can be anything but innocuous for any platform, so I'll take your word
for it that it must make a difference somewhere somehow.  :)

Please, go ahead.  Regards, Bruce