This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.

From: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
To: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:30:13 +0100
Subject: Re: RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.
References: <E55A3F76-4A4B-41F1-8EE7-BFB2B0EA61C8@dalecki.de> <43DF57D6.9080800@suse.de>

On 2006-01-31, at 13:28, Paolo Carlini wrote:

As a general policy, I think you should mention the target for which you did the regression tests. Also see:

http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

Thanks,


OK: PowerPC MacOSX 8.4.4 and intel SuSE 10.0. Those are the target's I'm
usually testing against.

References:
- RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.
  - From: Marcin Dalecki
- Re: RFR: Using XNEW.../XCNEW... allocations.
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]