This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, This patch adjusts calls to warning() in the C++ front end to not use 0 but instead use the appropriate OPT_W values, there was some other calls which I didn't change as I wasn't totally sure of the right value to use in it's place so this patch addresses the more obvious occurrences. Bootstrapped successfully on i686-pc-linux-gnu, is a regression test required for patches of this nature? 2006-01-28 Lee Millward <lee.millward@gmail.com> *typeck.c (string_conv_p, build_array_ref): pass the appropriate OPT_Wxxxx warning flag when calling warning() instead of passing 0. (cxx_mark_addressable, check_return_expr): Likewise. *init.c (perform_member_init): Likewise. (sort_mem_initializers, emit_mem_initializers): Likewise. *class.c (check_bases, check_field_decl): Likewise. (check_field_decls, layout_empty_base): Likewise. (build_base_field, layout_virtual_bases): Likewise. (warn_about_ambiguous_bases, layout_class_type): Likewise. *decl.c (pop_label, poplevel, duplicate_decls): Likewise. (grok_op_properties, start_preparsed_function): Likewise. (finish_function): Likewise. *method.c (lazily_declare_fn): Likewise. *.cvt.c (convert_to_void): Likewise. *mangle.c (finish_mangling): Likewise *name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Likewise. *parser.c (p_parser_warn_min_max): Likewise. (cp_parser_cast_expression): Likewise.
Attachment:
warnings_patch.txt.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |