This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] for PR23855


On 1/21/06, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > >For these reasons, I believe having this common special case handled
> > >separately makes sense.  Also, this makes it easy to have this
> > >transformation performed very early in the compilation process, thus
> > >making it possible for other optimizations to benefit from it.
> > >
> > >Bootstrapped & regtested on ppc and ia64.
> >
> > Do you have performance numbers because PR 23855 blocks PR 23970 which
> > is
> > a reduced testcase from SPEC?
> > Yes this should help SPEC but knowing how much would be helpful.
>
> I have checked the testcase from PR23970, it seems that the patch has
> the desired effect (loads of stride* are moved completely out of loops,
> multiplication by k to the outermost loop, etc.).  For the effects on
> specs, see below (base without the patch, peak with, both -O2
> -march=athlon).
>
> Btw. which benchmark is testcase from PR 23970 supposed to be extracted
> from? I would expect more significant improvement in that benchmark, so
> I wanted to have a look at it, but I could not find anything resembling
> the code.

It's of course extracted from tramp3d ;)  I'll try the patch on it in a second.

Thanks for the work!
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]