Re: PATCH: testsuite/25741: Gcc testsuite isn't parallel build

[Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:46:58PM -0800, Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
> 
> >Subject: Re: PATCH: testsuite/25741: Gcc testsuite isn't parallel build
> >safe
> >Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> >Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:27:03 -0800
> >In-Reply-To: <20060111225438.GA14482@lucon.org>
> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> >
> >On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:54:38PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> >> The problem is gcc testsuite uses the same tmpdir for testcases of
> >> differrent compilers. It is very hard to avoid the same prefix being
> >> used in different testcases for different compilers. As the result,
> >> "make -j 4 check" may lead to testcases for different compilers with
> >> the same prefix may override each other. This patch sets a different
> >> tmpdir for each compiler. The result is at
> >>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00551.html
> >>
> >> 2006-01-10  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> >>
> >> 	PR testsuite/25741
> >> 	* Makefile.in (check-%): Depend on site.exp instead of
> >> 	$(TESTSUITEDIR)/site.exp. Run "runtest" in separate language
> >> 	directories.
> >
> >This is OK.  I tried it with many of my own scripts that run subsets of
> >tests in odd little ways and only needed to change one of them.
> >
> 
> Gcc 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 have the same problems. I am using the same patch
> on 4.1. I am enclosing a patch for 3.4 and a patch for 4.0 here. Are
> they OK to apply?

Apply it to trunk now and if there are no complaints, apply it to
the branches in a couple of days.

Janis