This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
>Subject: Re: PATCH: testsuite/25741: Gcc testsuite isn't parallel build >safe >Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:27:03 -0800 >In-Reply-To: <20060111225438.GA14482@lucon.org> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i > >On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:54:38PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: >> The problem is gcc testsuite uses the same tmpdir for testcases of >> differrent compilers. It is very hard to avoid the same prefix being >> used in different testcases for different compilers. As the result, >> "make -j 4 check" may lead to testcases for different compilers with >> the same prefix may override each other. This patch sets a different >> tmpdir for each compiler. The result is at >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00551.html >> >> 2006-01-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> >> >> PR testsuite/25741 >> * Makefile.in (check-%): Depend on site.exp instead of >> $(TESTSUITEDIR)/site.exp. Run "runtest" in separate language >> directories. > >This is OK. I tried it with many of my own scripts that run subsets of >tests in odd little ways and only needed to change one of them. > Gcc 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 have the same problems. I am using the same patch on 4.1. I am enclosing a patch for 3.4 and a patch for 4.0 here. Are they OK to apply? Thanks. H.J.
Attachment:
gcc-4.0-ppp-1.patch
Description: gcc-4.0-ppp-1.patch
Attachment:
gcc-3.4-ppp-1.patch
Description: gcc-3.4-ppp-1.patch
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |