This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: RDOS support for libstdc++-v3
- From: "Leif Ekblad" <leif at rdos dot net>
- To: "Bernardo Innocenti" <bernie at develer dot com>
- Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:12:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH: RDOS support for libstdc++-v3
- References: <200512300401.13275.bjoern.m.haase@web.de> <03c801c60d4e$09d85320$410aa8c0@codab.home> <03ef01c60d4f$f76385f0$410aa8c0@codab.home> <d912337b23d95d7903e7499e32a28d4a@physics.uc.edu> <00a901c60d6f$b9074470$0201a8c0@LEIFACER> <43C393E0.9020707@develer.com>
- Reply-to: leif at rdos dot net
Bernando:
> It's a leftover from when specific (and, in some cases,
> customized) versions of the auto tools were required to
> build GCC. The requirements are now more relaxed.
>
> I'd favour removing these from SVN and adding the usual
> autogen.sh script like any other autoconf based project
> does.
So, does that mean that if I remove configure, it will be
recreated in the configuration process?
> Before you can add rdos support to GCC, you may need to send patches
> for the new platform to the maintainers of the "config" and "libtool"
> projects. Both are hosted at Savannah:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config/
This has been done a while ago. I just replaced
the original configuration files from the config-project manually
since they are not part of the version I'm using. I don't
think they have been synchronized in the current version either.
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/libtool/
OK, I'll look into libtool as well. Thanks for the tip.
Regards,
Leif Ekblad