This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/RFA] --with-build-time-tools configure option


dj@redhat.com (DJ Delorie)  wrote on 05.01.06 in <200601052149.k05LnPQl023711@greed.delorie.com>:

> Of course, that applies mostly to --host tools.  For target tools it's
> a bit more consistent, although "traditionally" gcc finds its tools in
> a different location than the user does - it looks for $target/bin/as
> but the user often uses $target-as instead, and there are more
> $target-foo tools than $target/bin/foo ones.

And that broke I forget what build, so I currently add a step linking the  
ones to the others where missing. (Obviously something that needed to use  
one of the missing tools and wasn't prepared to use the $target- names.)

To state it another way, $target-gcc is useful to have in your $PATH all  
the time, and $target/bin/gcc is useful to put into $PATH for the duration  
of some cross-compiles ... and that's true for all tools.

Is there a good reason for the discrepancy?

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]