This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments

From: Tobias SchlÃter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:15:44 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments
References: <43BA9061.1000003@wanadoo.fr> <43BC44CC.6010502@wanadoo.fr> <43BD98BA.1050808@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <43BDADF1.9010301@wanadoo.fr>

Paul Thomas wrote:
> They are all right because the entire expression is walked by 
> gfc_walk_expr, which returns gfc_reverse_ss (res) - see the snippet above.

Yes, I missed that when I looked through the code.

Thanks,
- Tobi

References:
- [Patc, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments.
  - From: Paul Thomas
- [Patch, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR22146 - ICE on elemental subroutine calls with array-valued actual arguments
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]